| |
News
Subscribe
to Our Newsletter
Sign
up for Email Updates
CGF
In the News
Press
Inquiries
Past
Articles
Calendar
|
|
|
Frog habitat destroyed
on Phillips Brooks School property
by Lennie Roberts
The celebrated jumping frog of Mark Twain's
day isn't jumping with joy these days in Woodside. The 92-acre site owned
by Phillips Brooks School is home to the federally protected California
red-legged
frog, which inhabits two small ponds on the property, along with the
southwestern pond turtle and many other aquatic critters.
The frogs used to be found in vast areas of the state, but today their
population has dwindled to such a degree that they are listed as a Federally
Threatened Species. Any project that may affect their habitat is required
to adopt strict measures to protect the frogs from any possibility of
"taking" (killing).
The Environmental Impact Report (EIR) for the now-defunct Phillips Brooks
School project, acknowledging that frogs are on the property, required
that a 100-foot buffer zone be established around any wetland site on
the property, where no disturbance would be allowed to occur. The EIR
also recommended measures for fire protection such as mowing a fire break
in the grasslands, but required that no mowing should invade the 100-foot
buffer zone around the ponds and wetlands.
The ink was hardly dry on the EIR last June when the school, apparently
at the specific request of the Woodside Fire Department, mowed a 100-foot
wide swath through the grasslands along the edges of the property. In
direct contravention of the EIR mitigation measures for the frog, the
school invaded the buffer zone and mowed right up next to the edge of
the wetlands around the ponds.
It is unknown whether any frogs were killed by this irresponsible mowing.
There wasn't any investigation of the mowing until Committee for Green
Foothills filed a complaint with the fish and wildlife agencies in July,
and by then it was too late to look for dead frogs. However, under the
Endangered Species Act, destroying habitat is also a violation of the
law. Frogs use areas beyond ponds for foraging, and have been documented
to range up to a mile from streams and wetlands, so this mowing has certainly
altered conditions of the natural habitat on which they depend.
This incident points out an all too frequent pattern with EIRs and mitigation
measures. Great attention is paid to instituting protections, and the
applicant(s) profess that they are committed to being good stewards of
the land, but over time critical mitigation measures are forgotten or
ignored. With an institution, it is particularly difficult to ensure that
mitigation measures become an enduring part of their operation, as institutional
memories can be lost as people come and go.
Since the summertime devastation of the frog habitat, the
Woodside Planning Commission voted 4-3 to deny the controversial proposed
development of this rural property, planned for several years by Phillips
Brooks School.
Meanwhile, the frogs didn't have a voice in this debate. We hope that
Woodside's leaders will speak up for the frogs - and for open space -
as they deliberate on future uses of this property.
Published October 2002 in Green
Footnotes.
Page last updated
September 13, 2010. |
|