| |
News
Subscribe
to Our Newsletter
Sign
up for Email Updates
CGF
In the News
Press
Inquiries
Past
Articles
Calendar
|
|
|
The Mercury News
February 11, 2003
Unsightly towers
Plan for new structures
near I-280 spurs debate
By Marilee Enge
A string of electricity transmission towers running
through San Mateo County has for decades been part of the landscape along
scenic Interstate 280, a route known as "The World's Most Beautiful
Freeway.''
Now, as Pacific Gas & Electric proposes to replace the structures
with taller ones carrying more powerful lines, environmentalists want
PG&E to seize the opportunity and take down the unsightly towers altogether,
opening views of the undeveloped watershed lands lying west of the highway.
The Committee for Green Foothills is urging PG&E to move the power
lines underground wherever possible as it prepares to rebuild a 27-mile
transmission system running from Brisbane in the north to near Woodside
in the south. The matter is before the California Public Utilities Commission.
"How often do you get to remove something?'' asked Lennie Roberts,
legislative director for the 40-year-old organization that works to protect
the Peninsula's open spaces from development. "There's a lot of things
I'd like to restore,'' she said. "I'd like to restore the Santa Clara
Valley to orchards. It's not going to happen. I'd like to restore Hetch
Hetchy. It's probably not going to happen. Here, it's doable. It's really
an exciting prospect.''
Her group is particularly concerned with the towers that border Edgewood
County Park, a suburban refuge for rare serpentine grasslands, unusual
wildflowers and the threatened bay checkerspot butterfly. Building taller
transmission towers with a wider footprint near the park could disrupt
wildlife, Roberts said, but going underground near such sensitive habitat
is out of the question, too. She wants PG&E to explore routes away
from the park.
"We want to look at it really carefully,'' Roberts said, "to
see where would they get the most benefit from undergrounding it.''
PG&E says the upgrade is needed to ensure a reliable power supply
and accommodate growth in San Francisco and northern San Mateo County.
The California Independent System Operator recommended the expansion.
"California's population continues to grow, and with that grows the
demand for electricity,'' said PG&E spokesman Paul Moreno. "To
adequately plan for reliability, transmission upgrades need to occur.
We want to keep the lights on.''
The northern section, from a transition station in San Bruno to the Martin
substation near the Cow Palace in Brisbane, would be built underground,
according to PG&E's proposal. But the southern route, a 14.7-mile
stretch between San Bruno and the Jefferson substation in western unincorporated
Redwood City, would remain above-ground; lattice steel towers that stand
80 to 90 feet high would be replaced by 90- to 115-foot towers.
The company will listen to neighbors and environmentalists. Nothing is
final yet, Moreno said. But, he added, burying the entire southern section
would cost far more than the projected $180 million price for the project.
Underground lines are more vulnerable to earthquakes, Moreno added.
Meanwhile, a group of homeowners known as the 280 Corridor Concerned Citizens
Group also opposes the larger towers because they would affect views and
property values. Edward O'Neill, an attorney for the residents, said PG&E
has not proved that expanded capacity is necessary.
"The need for the project needs to be analyzed more thoroughly,''
he said. "Alternatives other than this line need to be looked at.''
Among those alternatives, he said, PG&E should reconsider its plans
to retire an outdated and polluting power plant in San Francisco's Hunter's
Point neighborhood.
The residents also want the company to consider moving the transmission
line west of 280, onto watershed lands, an idea that makes conservationists
shudder.
An environmental review prepared by the Public Utilities Commission staff
will consider several alternatives and make recommendations to an administrative
judge later this year. PG&E hopes to begin construction in April 2004,
and construction is expected to take about a year and four months.
IF YOU'RE INTERESTED
Call PG&E at (800) 234-2117. Visit the California Public Utilities
Commission Web site at www.cpuc.ca.gov, or call the CPUC public adviser
at (415) 703-2074.
Contact Marilee Enge at menge@sjmercury.com or (415) 394-6895.
Page last updated
February 11, 2003
. |
|