Mercury News perspective on Coyote Valley shifting?

The Merc has two new editorials on Coyote Valley, in advance of today’s Coyote Valley Task Force meeting:

Triggering Coyote, and Main Issues Must Be Solved Before Approval.

The Merc is right to insist on “triggers” that require job creation prior to Coyote Valley residential development. From CGF’s perspective, this requirement shows the fallacy of developing Coyote Valley, since it will be years before the City needs to expand to that area.

The Merc is also right to insist on a greenbelt, although we are frankly cynical about whatever San Jose will ultimately propose. The City may try to ram a square peg of developed residences into the round hole of greenbelt purposes, and announce a perfect fit.

Where the Merc is wrong is supporting the current timetable for planning. It is right to support advanced planning rather than rushed, last-minute planning, but what we have here is rushed, last-minute advanced planning in order to accommodate Mayor Gonzales’ term of office. People take over a year to design their dream home, but San Jose hopes to plan a city of 80,000 in the same amount of remaining time. If there’s any reason for planning something that is so far away from being needed, at least it should not be rushed.

Nevertheless, the Merc appears to be listening to critics of Coyote Valley proposals. We’ll keep working on them.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Note

You are leaving the Green Foothills website to go to our Protect Coyote Valley website.

Continue on to PCV Website

Note

You are leaving the Green Foothills website to go to our Protect Coyote Valley website.

Continue on to PCV Petition

Note

You are leaving the Green Foothills website to go to the Protect Juristac website.

Continue on to Juristac Petition

Note

You are leaving the Green Foothills website to go to our 2021 CALA Application.

Continue on to 2021 CALA Application